Inconsumercomplaints.com » Lawyers & Legal Counseling » Review / complaint: Lawyer - Save 62 years bengali pilgrimages or holly place (durga mata ki mandir) at Kolkata dhakuria - 31 | News #369360

Lawyer
Save 62 years bengali pilgrimages or holly place (durga mata ki mandir) at Kolkata dhakuria - 31

Need a help & Save 62 years bengali pilgrimages or holly place (durga mata ki mandir) at Kolkata dhakuria - 31

Case :

In 1951 my grandfather's father Late Nepal Chandra Roy Chowdhury have a property nearly about 9 katha at 34 nagen ghosh lane, in these 9 katha 3 katha each are separately distributed into 3 sons out of 4 sons. In between this my segh dadu's late nepal chandra's segho son's property are taken by nepal chandra and give it to his elder son's wife late abha rani roy chowdhury 1 katha 4 chatak with Rs. 3000 on 1961. These 1 katha 4 chatak have mutation in 34/2 nagen ghosh lane, kolkata - 31, tax paper is ok, These primeses had a durga mandir and nearly about 62 years before this settlement done by late nepal chandra Roy Chowdhury durga puja occured by Abha Rani Roy Chowdhury and now her 3 sons till today 2010.

Now a problem occur, late Nepal chandra Roy Chowdhury's Sejo Son's, son's wife (mrs Jhuma Roy Chowdhury) filling a case that 34 nagen ghosh lane and 34/2 nagen ghosh lane are same only one property. She says everything is fraud Roy Chowdhury's son's are fraud then court are fraud.

She is claiming that this is my property her laywer also tell that, for 62 year durga mandir is fraud?

For 62 years Late Abha Rani Roy Chowdhury’s son’s doing this puja is fraud? For 34/2 Nagen Ghosh Lane, Kolkata -31 is fraud? Mutation paper is fraud? Tax paper is fraud? I want a clarification from all lawyer and need your help.

Now Jhuma Roy Chowdhury points:

1. In 1951 Late Nepal Chandra Roy Chowdhury given this property to his segho son’s Late Kanai Roy Chowdhury In 1961 Late Nepal Chandra Roy Chowdhury sale 1 katha 4 chatak within his property of Rs. 3000 out of his segho son’s Late Kanai Roy Chowdhury’s property. Why 10 years after Then our question is that then from 62 year we are doing durga puja here then why after 62 years they are claiming?

2. This is a pilgrimage place or holly place because 62 year all people of this para are seeing this puja they are now coming to giving their signature to the court paper that this is a pilgrimage place please don’t stop this puja. Now Jhuma Roy Chowdhury claiming that I am doing this puja &false statement to the police officers at Kasba police.

3. Now Jhuma Roy Chowdhury has applying some mussels power she was breaking our locks and given her own locks to the mandir. Now every day we give a new lock to our mandir and she breaks it and given her own locks. We have taken a photo of her to break our lock we give it to police station –police said that you have a habit of taking photo what should we do? Even her laywer tell court paper what we have said all are fraud shouting. If this is fraud then he actually said that law& order of our country are fraud? The lawyer is Arabindra Ghosh (x professor of bangasi college) How he can do that?

4. Now Jhuma Roy Chowdhury has applying some mussels power with a promoter and taking all this land and build up a flats and remove this pilgrimages place.

Our question is anybody there who can save this durga mandir this holly place from promoters and Jhuma Roy Chowdhury she is a dangerous, everyday betting his husband etc.

Mussels power and promoters plan out destroying our pilgrimages place or holly place of Bengali where durga puja occurred till 62 years are lost now.

Please help us this pilgrimages place.


Company: Lawyer

Country: India   State: West Bengal

Category: Lawyers & Legal Counseling

0 comments

Information
Only registered users can leave comments.
Please Register on our website, it will take a few seconds.




Quick Registration via social networks:
Login with FacebookLogin with Google